![]() www.pathfindnews.com |
![]() [Back to Events] [Features] [Features2] [Home] |
Advertise your events in The Pathfinder, the original holistic leader in the Midwest, published since March 1990. Contact plasma@brick.net for details or check rates, | |
Updated bimonthly: Mar/Apr 2012 issue |
|
INSIDE features, cont. from Mar/Apr 2012 Pathfinder. pg 5, Royal Rife and other Medical Martyrs, Pt 3 pg 6, They Want to Sneak 'Agent Orange' into our Food? pg 7, The Battle of All Mothers pg 7, What Happened to Baby Irene When She Received a "Cocktail" of Seven Vaccines? |
Another tribute to. . . Royal Rife and other Medical Martyrs, Pt. 3, conclusion The last thing in the world that the pharmaceutical industry wanted was a public trial about a painless therapy that cured 100 percent of the terminal cancer patients . . . | |
|
Submitted by Lea Walters, AIM. Excerpt reprinted as "fair use." Originally titled, "Royal Rife and the Rife Machine." Continued from the Mar/Apr 2012 issue. . . . At first, a token attempt was made to buy out Rife. Morris Fishbein, who had acquired the entire stock of the American Medical Association by 1934, sent an attorney to Rife with 'an offer you can't refuse.' Rife refused. We many never know the exact terms of this offer [to Rife], but we do know the terms of the offer Fishbein made to Harry Hoxsey for control of his herbal cancer remedy. Fishbein's associates would receive all profits for nine years and Hoxsey would receive nothing. Then, if they were satisfied that it worked, Hoxsey would begin to receive 10% of the profits. . . When Hoxsey turned Fishbein down, Fishbein used his immensely powerful political connections to have Hoxsey arrested 125 times in a period of 16 months. The charges (based on practice without a license) were always thrown out of court, but the harassment drove Hoxsey insane. . . .Fishbein must have realized that this strategy would backfire with Rife. First, Rife could not be arrested like Hoxsey for practicing without a license. A trial on trumped-up charges would mean that testimony supporting Rife would be introduced by prominent medical authorities working with Rife. And the defense would undoubtedly take the opportunity to introduce evidence such as the 1934 medical study done with USC. The last thing in the world that the pharmaceutical industry wanted was a public trial about a painless therapy that cured 100% of the terminal cancer patients and cost nothing to use but a little electricity. It might give people the idea that they didn't need drugs. . . . Rife had spent decades accumulating meticulous evidence of his work, including film and stop-motion photographs. No, different tactics were needed. . . The first incident was the gradual pilfering of components, photographs, film, and written records from Rife's lab. The culprit was never caught.d meticulous records. He named the cancer virus 'Cryptocides primordiales.' . . .While Rife struggled to reproduce his missing data (in a day when photocopies and computers were not available), someone vandalized his precious virus microscopes. Pieces of the 5,682 piece Universal microscope were stolen. Earlier, an arson fire had destroyed the multimillion dollar Burnett Lab in New Jersey, just as the scientists there were preparing to announce confirmation of Rife's work. But the final blow came later, when police illegally confiscated the remainder of Rife's 50 years of research. Then in 1939, agents of a family which controlled the drug industry assisted Philip Hoyland in a frivolous lawsuit against his own partners in the Beam Ray Corporation. This was the only company manufacturing Rife's frequency instruments (Rife was not a partner). Hoyland lost, but his assisted legal assault had the desired effect: the company was bankrupted by legal expenses. And during the Great Depression, this meant that commercial production of Rife's frequency instruments ceased completely. Doctors who tried to defend Rife lost their foundations grants and hospital privileges. On the other hand, big money was spent ensuring that doctors who had seen Rife's therapy would forget what they saw. Almost no price was too much to suppress it. Remember that, today, treatment of a single cancer patient averages over $300,000. It's BIG business. top |
Thus, Arthur Kendall, the Director of the Northwestern School of Medicine who worked with Rife on the cancer virus, accepted almost a $125 million to suddenly 'retire' in Mexico. Dr. George Dock, another prominent figure who collaborated with Rife, was silenced with an enormous grant, along with the highest honors the AMA could bestow. Between the carrots and the sticks, everyone except Dr. Couche and Dr. Milbank Johnson gave up Rife's work and went back to prescribing drugs. To finish the job, medical journals, supported almost entirely by drug company revenues and controlled by the AMA, refused to publish any paper by anyone on Rife's therapy. Therefore, an entire generation of medical students graduated into practice without ever once hearing of Rife's breakthroughs in medicine. The magnitude of such an insane crime eclipses every mass murder in history. Cancer picks us off quietly. . . but by 1960 the casualties from this tiny virus exceeded the carnage of all the wars America ever fought. In 1989, it was estimated that 40 percent of us will experience cancer at some time in our lives. Today's Rife instruments use harmonics of the frequencies shown on the display screen. The wavelength of the actual frequency shown (770hz, 880hz, etc.) is too long to do the job. In Rife's lifetime, he had witnessed the progress of civilization from horse-and-buggy travel to jet planes. In that same time, he saw the epidemic of cancer increase from 1 in 24 Americans in 1905 to 1 in 3 in 1971 when Rife died. He also witnessed the phenomenal growth of the American Cancer Society, the Salk Foundation, and many others collecting hundreds of millions of dollars for diseases that were cured long before in his own San Diego laboratories. In one period, 176,500 cancer drugs were submitted for approval. Any that showed 'favorable' results in only one-sixth of one percent of the cases being studied could be licensed. Some of these drugs had a mortality rate of 14-17%. When death came from the drug, not the cancer, the case was recorded as a 'complete' or 'partial remission' because the patient didn't actually die from the cancer. In reality, it was a race to see which would kill the patient first: the drug or the disease. The inevitable conclusion reached by Rife was that his lifelong labor and discoveries had not only been ignored but probably would be buried with him. At that point, he ceased to produce much of anything and spent the last third of his life seeking oblivion in alcohol. It dulled the pain and his acute awareness of half a century of wasted effort - ignored - while the unnecessary suffering of millions continued so that a vested few might profit. And profit they did, and profit they do. In 1971, Royal Rife died from a combination of valium and alcohol at the age of 83. Perhaps his continual exposure to his own Rife frequencies helped his body endure abuse for so many years. One day, the name of Royal Raymond Rife may ascend to its rightful place as the giant of modern medical science. Unfortunately, the original Rife technology has been destroyed and the machines that are available now are only an approximation, some probably more efficacious than others. We who work with EMC2 believe that The AIM Program is a [natural offshoot] of Rife's work]. . . top | |
|
Dr. Mercola's Health News (Feb. 12, 2012) They Want to Sneak"Agent Orange" into Our Food? © by Dr. Mercola, drmercola.com top Material obtained from Dr. Mercola's site, articles/mercola.com. Reprinted as"fair use." Originally titled"Hidden "Agent Orange" Chemical They Want to Sneak into Your Food." Edited for brevity. Editor's comments in square brackets. Agent Orange, produced by both Monsanto and Dow Chemicals, was used to defoliate jungles during the Vietnam War. During that time, millions of gallons of the toxic chemical mixture were sprayed on trees and vegetation, and the aftermath left hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese sick, with countless numbers of their children suffering birth defects, and a still growing group of US veterans with related diseases ranging from cancer to Parkinson's disease. Agent Orange was a horrific chemical concoction that never should have been used, and [its effects on exposed children an unforgivable"bio-crime"] . . .Why am I bringing this up now? Because Dow AgroSciences (a subsidiary of Dow Chemicals), who was one of the original manufacturers of Agent Orange (AO), has developed a new generation of genetically modified (GM) crops soybeans, corn and cotton that are designed to resist a major ingredient in AO: the herbicide called 2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D). The use of 2,4-D. . . is not new, as it is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world. What is new and disturbing is that now that staple crops like soy and corn have been engineered to be resistant to 2,4-D, it may soon be applied to US arable land on an unprecedented scale not unlike its indiscriminate application during Vietnam. [No surprise. . . ], at the core of the problem is big industry, which is blinded by greed and enabled by a corrupt governmental system that permits the profit-driven sacrifice of our environment. Unfortunately, this motivation reflects an extreme shortsightedness about the long-term survival of the human race, as well as of our planet. Not only are commercial agricultural practices harming honeybee colonies, but your own health is being compromised by deceptive marketing practices about the "honey" you buy, some of which isn't really honey at all, despite what it says on the label. The whole point of engineering resistance to an herbicide within a GMO plant, of course, is so that you can"carpet bomb" an entire field, leaving only your"Frankenfoods" standing, without having to exert even a fraction of the effort required raise crops organically and sustainably. . . .[I]f 2,4-D resistant crops receive approval and eventually come to replace Monsanto's failing Roundup-resistant crops as Dow intends, it is likely that billions of pounds will be needed, on top of the already insane levels of Roundup now being used (1.6 billion lbs were used in 2007 in the US alone!). Agent Orange Ingredient to be Used in GMO Crops Dow's new GM product, dubbed"Enlist," is a three-gene, herbicide-tolerant soybean that has been engineered to be resistant to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's popular Roundup herbicide, along with glufosinate and 2,4-D. The company expects to earn $1.5 billion in additional profit in 2013 by selling these triple herbicide-resistant seeds. As noted by the US Department of Veteran Affairs: The two active ingredients in the Agent Orange herbicide combination were equal amounts of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T), which contained traces of 2,3,7,8-tetra chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Ironically, while Dow's new crops would seriously escalate the use of 2,4-D, Monsanto is currently facing a class-action lawsuit involving the other Agent Orange ingredient, 2,4,5-T. The suit alleges that homes and schools near one of its 2,4,5-T chemical plants are now contaminated with cancer-causing dioxin, a byproduct of the manufacturing process. This should be a wake-up call to those considering widespread application of any toxic Agent Orange ingredient. Dow, however, is touting the new product as a solution to Monsanto's Roundup Ready GM crops, which currently dominate the GM seed market but are now being overshadowed by problems with weed resistance (not to mention that glyphosate itself is toxic, and has been linked to infertility, among other serious health problems). Where Monsanto has failed, Dow and other chemical rivals like DuPont, Syngenta, and Bayer (which are also working on their own herbicide-resistant GM seeds) see opportunity . . . [A]ccording to an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. . . researchers [stated that Dow efforts to downplay widespread weed resistance certainly]"misrepresented the potential for 2,4-Dresistant weeds . . . and exaggerated the sustainability of their approach to addressing glyphosate-resistant weed problems in agriculture." [Repeat:"exaggerated the sustainabaility of their approach. . ."] They note 28 species across 16 plant families that have already evolved resistance to similar herbicides to 2,4-D. Further, as stated on GreenMedInfo, the new Enlist crops are setting the stage for even greater and simultaneous herbicide use, the health ramifications of which are completely unknown: Instead of learning from Monsanto's colossal mistakes (which happens when you play geneticist-as-God and use a broad spectrum poison to kill all but your"chosen" plants) Dow AgroScience's solution is to multiply the problem by a factor of three, creating the"first-ever, three-gene," herbicide-tolerant staple crops. What this means is that instead of using only one highly toxic herbicide (Roundup), three will be used simultaneously, further increasing the risk of serious exposures, and setting up the conditions for synergistic toxicities something that toxicological risk assessments on singular herbicide ingredients, which establish"an acceptable level of harm," never account for." Studies Show Increases in Cancer, Birth Defects With Use of 2,4-D What is known about 2,4-D so far is not reassuring, considering the devastation caused by Agent Orange. According to the EPA regarding 2,4-D specifically: Health effects of chronic or acute 2,4-D exposure reported for adults included blood, liver, and kidney toxicity. Specific effects included a reduction in hemoglobin and red blood cell numbers, decreased liver enzyme activity, and increased kidney weight. Acute exposure can result in skin and eye irritation. Acute exposure to very high concentrations of 2,4-D can cause the following clinical symptoms: stupor, coma, coughing, burning sensations in lungs, loss of muscular coordination, nausea, vomiting, or dizziness. Experimental animal studies of chronic oral exposure have reported adverse effects on the eye, thyroid, kidney, adrenals, and ovaries/testes. In addition, some experimental animal studies have reported teratogenic effects (birth defects) at high doses, including increased fetal death, urinary tract malformation, and extra ribs. top |
Experimental animal studies of chronic oral exposure have reported adverse effects on the eye, thyroid, kidney, adrenals, and ovaries/testes. In addition, some experimental animal studies have reported teratogenic effects (birth defects) at high doses, including increased fetal death, urinary tract malformation, and extra ribs. When adult female experimental animals were exposed to 2,4-D during their pregnancy and lactation periods, their exposed offspring exhibited neurological effects, including delayed neurobehavioral development and changes in several neurotransmitter levels or binding activities and ganglioside levels in the brain. Delayed neurobehavioral development was manifested as delays in acquisition of certain motor skills such as the righting reflex. The glaring problem, of course, is that [if] approved. . . Dow's . . .use of 2,4-D could skyrocket . . . As reported by The Cornucopia Institute: The concern is that, just like Monsanto's genetically engineered corn that is resistant to RoundUp (glyphosate) herbicide, the approval of a cultivar resistant to 2,4-D will cause an exponential increase in the use of this toxic agricemical," says Mark A. Kastel, senior farm policy analyst with The Cornucopia Institute:"2,4-D is a chlorophenoxy herbicide, and scientists around the world have reported increased cancer risks in association with its use, especially for soft tissue sarcoma and malignant lymphoma. Four separate studies in the US reported an association with chlorophenoxy herbicide use and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. . . . Research by the EPA found that babies born in counties with high rates of 2,4-D application to farm fields were significantly more likely to be born with birth defects of the respiratory and circulatory systems, as well as defects of the musculoskeletal system like clubfoot, fused digits and extra digits. These birth defects were 60% to 90% more likely in counties with higher 2,4-D application rates. The results also showed a higher likelihood of birth defects in babies conceived in the spring, when herbicide application rates peak. Weed Scientist Says,"We Told You So" In the same way that Dow is"certain" [Ed's quotes] that its new three-gene, herbicide-tolerant soybean will not spur the creation of more herbicide-resistant super weeds, Monsanto was adamant that Roundup Ready crops would not cause weed resistance. . . [N]ow that the die has been cast, the US is reaping the consequences with 13 resistant weed species covering more than 11 million acres, mostly those planted with Monsanto's GM soy, corn and cotton crops. Around the world, 21 weed species are now resistant to glyphosate, up from zero in 1996. The weeds are making Monsanto's promises that their GM crops would reduce pesticide use laughable since farmers are being forced to use multiple, and more, pesticides to keep weeds in their GM crops under control and are turning out to be a very big thorn in Monsanto's side. Monsanto's solution is similar to Dow's . . . add more herbicide-resistant genes to the plants so even more potent herbicide cocktails can be poured over US farmland! According to Monsanto CEO Hugh Grant, who was interviewed in Business Week, the company plans to add resistance to Dicamba, another weedkiller, to Roundup Ready crops by 2015. . . Unfortunately they are working for the wrong side, with their"war on weeds" causing massive collateral damage to environmental and human health alike. William G. Johnson, a weed scientist at Purdue University, told Business Week, these new technologies may control Roundup-resistant weeds . . .for 10 or 15 years" but"they . . . select for their own failure. . . Now that it has kind of blown up, it's like, 'We told you so'," he says. Adding further insult to injury, Johnson explains that"Dicamba and 2,4-D both tend to volatilize, turning the chemicals into vapor that can drift onto neighboring land. . ." . . . accidentally killing nearby crops and exposing greater expanses to its toxic effects. Let us also not forget that all the"weeds" these herbicides were designed to kill represent biodiversity, without which we would be left with only a handful of staple crops upon which our entire subsistence now precariously depends. Only because we do not find obvious value in a plant, does not mean it's not there. Emerson once said:"What is a weed? A plant whose virtues have not yet been discovered." Indeed, when we target as"the enemy" any living plant that does not bear the favored qualities of a GM plant, and use the slash-and-burn, herbicidal approach to eradicate any competing plant life form, we are basically declaring war on the biosphere itself, and thereby setting up the future conditions for the collapse of our entire food production system, as well as poisoning ourselves in the process. Without biodiversity, monoculturing puts"too many eggs in one basket," virtually guaranteeing future crop collapses and famine. In a nutshell, industrial herbicides (and the GM plants designed to thrive when exposed to them), are a dead end both figuratively, and literally. Is this an"act of war" against a Sleeping Population, [Editor's question] Dow has applied for non-regulated status of its 2,4-D-resistant corn, . . .[But] approving more herbicide-tolerant crops is not the solution to ending"super weeds"; the real solution lies in eliminating the genetically modified crops that created them in the first place! As Jay Feldman, executive director of Beyond Pesticides told The Cornucopia Institute: In 2012 the USDA is proposing approving a new GE corn variety that is resistant to a different toxic herbicide, escalating the toxic treadmill in chemical-dependent agriculture. This is nothing more than a band-aid solution to a serious problem, and will only give rise to more superweeds, more herbicide pollution in our environment, more herbicide poisoning, while likely leading to the need for even more toxic herbicides a couple of years down the line. This foolish circle has to end. It's quite clear that genetically engineered foods are not only threatening the food supply with the creation of herbicide-resistant weeds, but they can also pose potentially serious threats to animal and human health when consumed. Fortunately, now you, too, can let your opinion be heard on this issue. Several organizations, including Mercola.com, the Organic Consumers Association, the Institute for Responsible Technology, and the Environmental Working Group, are working to eliminate GMOs. . . .In the meantime, the simplest way to avoid GM foods is to buy whole, certified organic foods [or grow your own]. By definition, foods that are certified organic must never intentionally use GM organisms, must be produced without artificial pesticides and fertilizers and come from an animal reared without the routine use of antibiotics, growth promoters or other drugs. Additionally, grass-fed beef will not have been fed GM corn feed, although now that GM alfalfa is approved, grass-fed will not always mean GMO free. You can also look for foods that are"non-GMO verified" by the Non-GMO Project. Sources Green Med Info December 27, 2011 Reuters August 22, 2011 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the US March 15, 2011; 108(11): E37 Dr. Joseph Mercola, articles/mercola.com, Mercola.com, 3200 W. Higgins Rd., Hoffman Estates, IL 60169, provides some of the most detailed and health-preserving information available, as well as a wide range of health products. Also visit his site for Dr. Becker's health tips for your pets. top |
|
| |
|
Action Alert, March 14, 2012 The Battle of All Mothers top © Dr. Rima Material received with implicit permission to reprint. Reprinted excerpt as"fair use." Originally titled"The Battle of All Mothers Nourishing a Thriving Planet: Our Planetary Life Vision v.s. Their Globalist Genocidal Agenda." (See article submitted by Dr. Betty Martini regarding adverse vaccine reactions also on this page.) Vaccines, the Ultimate DNA 'Crap Shoot' Are you vaccinating yourself the way the CDC says you should? [Recently] they issued the latest 'guidelines' for adults. Although it may be too late to make you autistic, still, scientists know that vaccines can help you along the road to Alzheimer's Disease, Cancer, Infertility, Auto Immune Disease and a host of other 'Old World Disorder' (as one of my physician-friends calls it) routes to pharma profit (AKA: misery and death). Perhaps you are still vaccinating your children (although I sincerely cannot believe how a parent could, in anything like good conscience, yield up their child's body to such destructive contamination) because of the perceived pressures which make you feel that you should, or you must. [Related article, this page.] Neither, in my opinion is true. What is true is that every time you allow a vaccine of any type to enter your body or your child's you are rolling the dice with the dark gods of misfortune whose gaming table is your very DNA. . . .So there you have it. A genomicidal technology unmasked. The science behind another part of the Battle of All Mothers is clear. The choice is equally clear. And the course? That is clear, too. top |
1) Sign the Health Freedom Declaration for yourself and your family (tinyurl.com/Health FreedomDeclaration), [then] pass it on widely! 2) Call for a Congressional Hearing on the environmental causes of Autism, Allergies, Asthma and ADD/ADHD. It's mercury and more. [It's] The Syringe of Death. If you love yourself, your children, your health, your DNA, your rights as a human being, stand up and be heard. If you want to thrive, stand up and be heard. If you believe that humanity has a future, stand up and be heard. And if you have not watched the astonishingly beautiful and important movie, Thrive, sit down and watch it and THEN stand up and be heard. Yours in health and freedom, Dr. Rima top Natural Solutions Foundation, dr.laibow@ gmail.com, 58 Plotts Road Newton, NJ. 0786, Freeworldnet work.org. top |
|
Healthy Times Newspaper (Apr. 3, 2012) What Happened to Baby Irene When She Received a Cocktail of Seven Vaccines? top | ||
|
Submitted by Dr. Betty Martini with implicit permission to reprint. Excerpt reprinted as"fair use." Originally titled,"Baby receives cocktail of seven vaccines, loses ability to speak, recovers with homeopathic shock remedies." Also see related article,"Battle of All Mothers," this page. Editor's comments or remarks in square brackets.
HealthyTimesNewspaper: Baby Irene's dad agreed with his homeopathic physician, Hannah Eagle, about the dangers of vaccines. He certainly did not plan on vaccinating his 4-month old daughter. On December 4, 2011, however, under a tremendous amount of pressure from the family pediatrician, he and his wife acquiesced and allowed a single injection cocktail of seven vaccines, as follows: DPaT (3 vaccines: diphtheria, pertussis, tetnus), HIB, Pneumococcal, Polio, and Influenza. Baby Irene stopped communicating. Once home, she had a fever that eventually passed. The parents then began to notice that the ordinary babbling, cooing, baby talking, and so forth had completely ceased. Their baby could no longer talk! She would open her mouth and appear as if she were trying to speak, but could only manage to stick out her tongue."She is not talking at all," reported her terrified father."It seems to me when she tries to make noise, all she does is stick out her tongue. Her tongue is out a lot more now and she is chewing her thumb and moving her tongue around a lot in the process." Racked with guilt that they did not stand up to their physician and insist on their rights to care for their daughter's immune system as they saw fit, they rushed to Dr. Eagle in search of a homeopathic remedy. Homeopathic Treatment for Shock and Vaccination Remedy Two days after the shot, Irene received a low dose homeopathic remedy for shock. The following day, she got a high dose shock remedy, followed by a remedy commonly used for vaccinosis. The next three months were a roller coaster of improvements and regressions as Irene received homeopathic doses of each of the seven vaccines that caused the damage. This is an excellent utilization of the homeopathic principle that like cures like. As of February 8, 2012 baby Irene has returned to normalcy. She giggles, coos, screeches and gurgles again, much to the delight and relief of her parents. Irene's father wishes to maintain his anonymity, which is understandable. He feels grateful that, given the unfortunate circumstances, he and Dr. Eagle managed to help Irene dodge a major bullet. Dr. Eagle, who works with patients across the world, urges parents to educate themselves about the risks associated with vaccination and helps them boost their children's immune system naturally. top |
One in 88 children is diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. During pregnancy and the first two years of life, the brain is extremely vulnerable and should be protected as much as possible. Medication during and after pregnancy, especially vaccination, is very toxic to the young brain. In the bookAutism, Beyond Despairthere are several examples of this. Toxic Substances Affect Babies In Surprising Ways Dr. Tinus Smits, a world-renowned doctor who practiced homeopathy, once saw a dramatic improvement in an autistic girl [by the homeopathic detoxification of a nose spray, xylometazolin], which the mother had used regularly during her pregnancy. Prescription and over the counter medication, exposure to chemical substances that are foreign to the human body and fundamentally toxic, has become more and more [a] cause of illness. This is not only true for vaccines, but also for many of the treatments prescribed by modern doctors. [Ed's: DO YOUR OWN internet search for ANYTHING prescribed by a physician, over-the-counter preparation, or that you don't recognize that may appear as an ingredient in food/ personal care products, etc. One search method I often use is to enter the chemical/ prescription into a search engine like this example:"methylparaben, health concerns" then look through the results. IGNORANCE, nor BLIND ACCEPTANCE of any authority figure, even a"doctor" is never"recommended." ALSO make sure you apply any medicine warnings to yourself, instead of thinking they'll only apply to"someone else."]<> Resources: NaturalNews:"78 percent increase in childhood autism rates over past decade coincides with sharp uptick in vaccination schedules/ (www.naturalnews.com/035452_autism_ vaccinations_children.html) (ibid)"Medical insanity: Babies now being treated with dangerous diabetes drugs before they're even born," Mike Adams; www.naturalnews.com/ 035454_diabetes_drugs_babies_ expectant_ mothers.html)/ greenpsychology.net/about/hannah-eagle/ www.cdc.gov/ ncbddd/autism/data.html www.post-vaccination-syndrome.com3840/ pvs.aspx Healthy Times Newspaper, healthytimesnewspaper. com/, was founded by Mike and Hope Bundrant in 2004 to promote better health and awareness. top |